How to Choose a Data Engineering Company
A technical buyer's guide to evaluating vendors, avoiding mistakes, and negotiating contracts.
Executive Summary
Key finding: 64% of data platform migrations fail or significantly overrun budget due to poor vendor selection—not technical complexity.
The problem: Most evaluation processes optimize for sales polish, not delivery capability. Technical teams get 30-min demos, procurement gets 90-page proposals that all say the same thing.
This guide covers: Technical evaluation criteria that matter, red flags to watch for, contract gotchas, and questions that separate real expertise from slides.
Table of Contents
1. Pre-RFP: Defining What You Actually Need
⚠️ Most Common Mistake
Starting with "We need a Snowflake migration" instead of "We need to reduce time-to-insight from 3 weeks to 3 hours." The platform is a means, not the goal.
Define Success Metrics First
Before talking to vendors, document:
| Metric Type | Current State | Target State | Business Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | Daily batch runs take 8+ hours | Complete in <2 hours | Enable same-day decision making |
| Cost | $45K/month infrastructure | <$30K/month all-in | ROI in 18 months |
| Reliability | 12 pipeline failures/month | <2 failures/month | Reduce on-call burden |
| Team Velocity | 3 weeks to add new data source | <3 days | Accelerate product launches |
Stakeholder Alignment Matrix
Map who cares about what:
👔 CFO/Finance
- • Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
- • Payment terms & predictability
- • Time to ROI
- • Contract flexibility (exit clauses)
👨💻 Engineering Team
- • Technical architecture decisions
- • Knowledge transfer quality
- • Maintainability of solution
- • Tools & tech stack
📊 Data/Analytics Team
- • Data quality & governance
- • Self-service capabilities
- • Documentation standards
- • Query performance
🛡️ Security/Compliance
- • Data sovereignty & residency
- • Audit trails & lineage
- • Access controls (RBAC, ABAC)
- • Certifications (SOC2, ISO 27001)
✅ Pro Tip: The Constraint Theory Approach
Rank your constraints: Cost, Timeline, Quality/Scope. You can only optimize for 2. Be explicit about which one is flexible before vendor conversations start.
2. Technical Evaluation Framework
Architecture Deep Dive Session
Skip the sales deck. Request a 2-hour technical session with actual engineers who will work on your project. Bring your team. Use this structure:
Session Agenda (Share This in Advance)
Part 1: Your Current Architecture (30 min)
Share your architecture diagram. Watch how they react:
❌ Bad sign: "This is interesting, but we typically recommend starting fresh."
✅ Good sign: "I see you're using X pattern for Y—have you considered Z for this specific bottleneck?"
Part 2: Proposed Architecture (60 min)
Ask them to whiteboard a proposed solution. Evaluate:
- • Do they ask about data volumes, SLAs, and failure modes?
- • Do they discuss trade-offs explicitly? ("Lambda architecture gives you X but costs Y")
- • Do they mention observability, monitoring, alerting upfront?
- • Do they show awareness of cost implications of their design choices?
Part 3: Failure Scenarios (30 min)
Ask: "What breaks in this design when...?"
- • Source system schema changes unexpectedly?
- • Data volume spikes 10x for a week?
- • Cloud provider has a regional outage?
- • Upstream data quality degrades?
Technical Questions That Separate Pretenders
On Data Modeling:
"Walk me through how you'd model our [specific business entity]. Dimensional? Data Vault? Wide tables? Why?"
🎯 Looking for: Awareness of trade-offs. Skepticism of one-size-fits-all approaches.
On Orchestration:
"How do you handle dependencies between 50+ DAGs with different SLAs?"
🎯 Looking for: Mentions of idempotency, backfilling strategies, SLA monitoring, circuit breakers.
On Testing:
"What's your testing strategy for data pipelines? How do you test transformations before production?"
🎯 Looking for: Data quality checks, schema validation, volume anomaly detection, regression testing of transformations.
On Cost Optimization:
"Show me a cost breakdown from a similar project. What were the top 3 cost drivers and how did you optimize them?"
🎯 Looking for: Actual numbers. Awareness of compute vs. storage trade-offs. Query optimization strategies.
On Operational Handoff:
"Walk me through the runbook you'll create. What does day-2 operations look like?"
🎯 Looking for: Runbooks, alerting playbooks, on-call procedures, incident response templates.
⚠️ Certification Theater
"We have 47 Snowflake certifications!" means nothing if those certified engineers aren't on your project. Ask: "Which specific engineers on my team have which certs? Can I interview them?"
3. Team Assessment: Beyond Resumes
The Team Composition Red Flags
| Scenario | Why It's a Problem | What to Ask |
|---|---|---|
| All Senior Engineers (10+ yrs each) | Overpriced. Seniors get bored with implementation work. | "What's your typical senior:mid:junior ratio? Why this composition for us?" |
| All Junior Engineers (<3 yrs) | You're the training ground. Expect rework and long ramp-up. | "Who's the tech lead? What's their involvement—50%? 20%? Code reviews only?" |
| Unnamed Engineers ("TBD") | Bait and switch. You'll get whoever is available. | "I need named engineers with resumes before signing. Non-negotiable." |
| Offshore Team, No Overlap Hours | Communication lag kills velocity. 24hr feedback loops. | "What's the timezone overlap? How do we handle urgent issues?" |
| 100% Staff Aug (No Product Mindset) | They'll build what you spec, not what you need. | "Who owns the architecture? Who pushes back on bad requirements?" |
Interviewing the Actual Team
Demand to interview proposed team members. One-hour technical interview per key role:
For Data Engineers:
- • "Explain a time you had to debug a data quality issue in production."
- • "How do you approach partitioning strategy for a 10TB fact table?"
- • "Walk me through your ideal CI/CD pipeline for data."
- • Live coding: "Write a SQL query to detect schema drift between two tables."
For Solutions Architect:
- • "Design a real-time feature store for ML with 1ms p99 latency."
- • "How would you migrate 500 ETL jobs with zero downtime?"
- • "Explain CAP theorem and which side you'd optimize for in our use case."
- • "What's your approach to capacity planning and cost forecasting?"
For Tech Lead/PM:
- • "Tell me about a project that went off the rails. What happened? How did you recover?"
- • "How do you handle scope creep when the business keeps changing requirements?"
- • "What's your communication cadence with stakeholders? Show me your status report template."
✅ Chemistry Check
Include your actual engineers in interviews. If your team doesn't respect their team technically, the engagement is doomed. Ego clashes will torpedo knowledge transfer.
4. Commercial & Contract Evaluation
Pricing Models: What to Watch For
| Model | Pros | Cons | When to Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Price | Predictable budget. Vendor owns risk. | Inflexible. Change orders are expensive. Requires bulletproof spec. | Well-defined scope. Compliance-heavy. Risk-averse org. |
| Time & Materials | Flexible. Easy to adjust scope. | Unpredictable costs. Vendor has no incentive to finish. | Exploratory work. Evolving requirements. R&D projects. |
| Capped T&M | Flexibility + cost ceiling. | Caps are often set too high. Still need good scope management. | Most mid-market projects. Balanced risk sharing. |
| Outcome-Based | Aligned incentives. Pay for results. | Hard to define success. Requires trust + long-term relationship. | Performance optimization. Cost reduction mandates. |
Contract Red Flags
🚨 IP Ownership Traps
"Vendor retains ownership of all frameworks, accelerators, and IP created during engagement."
Why it's bad: You don't own your data models, pipelines, or orchestration code. Vendor lock-in.
Fix: "All work product created for Client is owned by Client. Vendor retains ownership of pre-existing tools/frameworks only."
🚨 Vague Acceptance Criteria
"Deliverable accepted when Client confirms it meets requirements."
Why it's bad: No objective measure. Endless "it's not quite right" revisions.
Fix: "Acceptance criteria defined in Appendix B. 5 business days to reject with specific defects listed. Silence = acceptance."
🚨 Open-Ended Change Orders
"Any changes to scope require written change order at Vendor's then-current rates."
Why it's bad: Vendor can raise rates mid-project. No cap on change order costs.
Fix: "Change orders capped at 20% of original contract value. Rates locked for contract duration + 12 months."
🚨 No Performance SLAs
"Vendor will use commercially reasonable efforts to meet timeline."
Why it's bad: "Reasonable efforts" is meaningless. No penalty for delays.
Fix: "Milestone dates are binding. Delays beyond 2 weeks trigger 5% fee reduction per week. After 6 weeks, Client may terminate for cause."
🚨 Weak Termination Clauses
"Contract may be terminated with 90 days notice. Client pays for all work performed plus wind-down costs."
Why it's bad: 90 days is forever when the team is underperforming. "Wind-down costs" are undefined.
Fix: "Termination for convenience: 30 days notice. Termination for cause (missed SLAs, key personnel changes): immediate. Wind-down capped at 10% of remaining contract value."
Payment Terms That Protect You
❌ Dangerous: 50% Upfront, 50% on "Completion"
Problem: You've paid 50% before seeing any working code. "Completion" is subjective. Vendor has no incentive to finish.
✅ Better: Milestone-Based Payments
20% on contract signature → 20% on architecture approval → 20% on dev environment delivery → 20% on UAT pass → 20% on production go-live + 30-day stabilization.
✅ Best: Milestone + Holdback
Milestone payments as above, but hold back 10% until 90 days post-launch. Covers warranty period, ensures they stick around for operational support.
5. Red Flags & Deal Breakers
🚩 Sales vs. Delivery Gap
Sales promises are vague/unrealistic. When you ask for specifics, they defer to "the team will figure it out."
Action: Walk away. This will not improve.
🚩 No Relevant Case Studies
"We've done lots of data projects!" but can't show one in your industry, at your scale, with your tech stack.
Action: You're the guinea pig. Expect pain.
🚩 Resistance to References
Can't provide 3+ recent references. Or references are from 2+ years ago. Or only provide glowing references (where are the normal/challenging projects?)
Action: Demand recent references. Call them, don't email.
🚩 One-Size-Fits-All Architecture
They have "the" architecture they always use. No customization for your actual requirements.
Action: You're buying a product, not consulting. Know what you're getting.
🚩 Dismissive of Your Team
"Your current architecture is all wrong. We'll rebuild from scratch." Without understanding context/constraints.
Action: Ego problem. Knowledge transfer will fail.
🚩 Overpromising on Timeline
Everyone else quoted 6 months. They say 3 months. With same scope. No clear explanation of how.
Action: They're either lying or cutting corners. Probably both.
🚩 No Code Samples
Can't show sample pipeline code, data quality checks, or orchestration DAGs due to "confidentiality."
Action: Request sanitized examples. No examples = no hire.
🚩 Unclear Offshore Model
Vague about which work happens where. "We have a global delivery model." Translation: you don't know who's doing what.
Action: Demand org chart with locations. Timezone overlap matrix.
6. Reference Checks That Actually Work
Reference calls are useless if you ask softball questions. Here's what to ask:
Reference Call Script (30 minutes)
1. Project Context (5 min)
- • "What was the original scope and timeline?"
- • "How did you select this vendor?"
- • "What was the team composition?"
2. Delivery Reality (10 min)
- • "Did they hit milestones? If not, what slipped and why?"
- • "How many change orders were there? What drove them?"
- • "Budget variance: how much over/under original estimate?"
- • "What surprised you (good or bad) during delivery?"
3. Team Quality (5 min)
- • "Rate the tech lead and team: what was great, what was weak?"
- • "Did they swap out team members mid-project?"
- • "How was communication? Responsiveness?"
- • "Could your team work with them, or was there friction?"
4. Post-Launch (5 min)
- • "How stable was the solution in first 90 days?"
- • "Did they stick around for support? How responsive?"
- • "Can your team maintain what they built, or are you locked in?"
- • "What's still broken 6 months later?"
5. The Honest Question (5 min)
- • "Would you hire them again? Why or why not?"
- • "What advice would you give me if I'm considering them?"
- • "On a scale of 1-10, how likely are you to recommend them? What would make it a 10?"
✅ Pro Tip: Ask for the Tech Lead
Don't just talk to the business sponsor. Ask to speak with the technical lead who worked with the vendor daily. They'll tell you about code quality, technical debt, and knowledge transfer reality.
7. Templates & Checklists
Vendor Evaluation Scorecard
Use this to compare vendors objectively. Score 1-5 for each criterion.
| Category | Weight | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Technical (35%) | 10% | Architecture quality & fit to requirements |
| 10% | Platform expertise & certifications (actual, not claimed) | |
| 10% | Code quality, testing approach, DevOps maturity | |
| 5% | Tooling, accelerators, reusable components | |
| Team (25%) | 10% | Team composition & seniority match |
| 10% | Individual engineer quality (from interviews) | |
| 5% | Culture fit & communication style | |
| Delivery (20%) | 10% | Relevant case studies & reference quality |
| 5% | Project management approach & tooling | |
| 5% | Risk mitigation & contingency planning | |
| Commercial (20%) | 15% | Pricing transparency & value for money |
| 5% | Contract terms & IP ownership |
Final Decision Checklist
Ready to Find Your Data Engineering Partner?
Use our comparison tool to evaluate top vendors based on your specific requirements.